Concepts

The vocabulary behind a review map.

ArkheionX is built around a simple idea: security review needs reproducible context before it needs conclusions. These concepts define the context the tool is meant to preserve.

Input Local repository
Mapping layer Protocol surface
Artifacts Roles · paths · assumptions · gaps · evidence
Reviewer Human judgment
01

Protocol surface

The reviewable shape of a protocol: contracts, actors, permissions, dependencies, value movement, assumptions, and evidence.

02

Role

An actor or authority that can affect protocol behavior, such as owner, admin, keeper, user, oracle, governance, or emergency role.

03

Value path

A route where assets, shares, rewards, collateral, or accounting value can move through the system.

04

Assumption

A condition the protocol appears to rely on, such as oracle freshness, access control correctness, accounting invariants, or timing behavior.

05

Test gap

A review-relevant behavior that appears important but is not clearly covered by tests or deterministic fixture checks.

06

Evidence link

A reference that connects review context back to source files, fixtures, snapshots, or generated artifacts.

07

Review package

A structured set of artifacts that helps humans inspect what was reviewed, what changed, and what still needs judgment.

08

Snapshot drift

A change between expected deterministic output and newly generated output.

09

Source fingerprint

A deterministic identifier that helps track the source inputs used to generate artifacts.

Important

Concepts are not verdicts.

A role, assumption, value path, or test gap is review context. It is not automatically a vulnerability. Human validation is required before any security conclusion.

Read safety model